New Update Reveals How Caucasians/Europeans at North America Want a “Cashless” Society
A “Cashless” Society for Colonizers Spells Manipulative Disaster for the Rest of the World
By: Real News at Florida Network and the New Update on the Downfalls of a Colonial Cashless Society at North America
Date: 26 February 2025 A.D.
The Deception of a Cashless Society: A New Update Unveils the Real Risks
In a new update, the idea of a cashless society has gained some deceptive traction, with corporate persons focused on sheer greed arguing that it brings convenience and efficiency to global financial transactions. However, a closer examination reveals that such a shift would easily serve as a deceptive ploy to consolidate power in the hands of a few corporations, with far-reaching implications for the general public and the way the world interacts with the economy stemming from the current state of North America in the hands of corrupted colonizers of Caucasian/European-descent and their incompetent helpers of said African-descent and their foreign allies abroad.
At the heart of the push for a cashless society, lies the notion of removing physical Legal Tender, and although Legal Tender (* See United States Republic Constitution – Article I, Section 10, Clause 1) was never truly authorized by the Constitution for the united states of America / united States of America Republic, as the only allowed money was always gold and silver, the forced acceptance remained in place for ninety-two (92) years, to date. With the Gold Abrogation Standard Act, implemented by House Joint Resolution 192 in 1933 A.D., all gold and silver was forcefully removed from circulation at North America, by fraudulent colonial powers that betrayed the foundation of the original Republic form of government that was historically prominent at North America. With the new update concerning the risky financial mechanisms that global elitists try to deceitfully implement, the corporate persons argue that digital transactions streamline purchases, reduce costs, and enhance convenience. Yet, as appealing as such arguments may seem, they overlook the fundamental rights that come with tangible finance: the ability to make personal financial decisions, without corporate oversight and the option to seek recourse when transactions go awry.
One of the most pressing concerns with a cashless society, is the power it grants large corporations over the everyday lives of the average person. In a world where every transaction is recorded and monitored electronically, the risk of manipulation rises exponentially. Major corporations, which often have ties to political power, can exert undue influence over the purchasing behaviors of the general public, steering people and consumers toward specific products and services that may not align with their best interests. Such forced control is further exacerbated by the potential for unlawful and illegal surveillance, where corporations and, by extension, colonial, foreign body politics operating specifically from North America as a global financial conglomerate, can track personal spending habits and use that data for targeted advertising or even controlling access to goods based on economic status or political alignment.
Moreover, the infrastructure for electronic transactions is not as stable as it might seem. Electronic transaction systems can be, and have been, shut down unexpectedly due to technical failures, cyberattacks, or corporate decisions. Imagine a scenario where a significant corporation decides to discontinue its financial transaction processing service or is forced to shut down due to a security breach. In a cashless society, people and consumers would be left to navigate a landscape where their access to funds is entirely dependent on the whims of corporate entities and corrupted persons who would not be affected by such dilemmas, as they control the circumstances that benefit themselves. The new update concerning such a crisis actuality proves the very instability that clearly poses a real threat, particularly to those who may not have alternative means to access their funds under such circumstances.
The removal of cash also from the general public at retail locations strips people and consumers of the right to anonymity in their transactions, as well. Cash allows people and consumers the freedom to make purchases without leaving a digital footprint, a form of privacy that is increasingly rare in modern society. In a cashless world, personal information becomes an asset for corrupted corporations and the often greedy persons who operate them, who can also profit from selling user data or utilizing it for targeted manipulation, as the world witnesses today on a global scale.
Furthermore, the notion of refunds and recourse involved with a cashless society agenda becomes more complex. With cash transactions, obtaining a refund typically involves a straightforward exchange of Legal Tender. However, electronic transactions can be riddled with hurdles, including fees and disputes that require navigating through often “rigged Artificial Intelligence (A.I.)” Customer Service channels that prioritize corporate interests over the rights of the natural people, as well as consumer rights. Imagine spending anywhere from 15 minutes to 1 hour waiting for a Customer Service Agent to answer your call, after you going through lengthy and tedious phone prompts, only to have Customer Service Agents prove insignificant in resolving anything, as they have a strong tendency to tell Customers the “Sorry, it’s company policy” or other excuses to favor shady and unethical corporate decisions, in an ultimate deception that frustrates Customers to the extreme. The disparity highlights a fundamental imbalance that favors corporate conglomerates and diminishes the power of the upright and considerate people, as well as consumer power.
When corporate persons try to push policy against their Customers, there is the consideration of the reality that Policy is not Law. There is a major difference. Policy refers to internal corporate rules that corporate persons assume that their Customers agree-to when Customers purchase products or services from the corporation. However, unless such contractual agreements are mutually agreed-upon (as in knowingly, willingly, and with competence) by both parties (Customer and Corporation Entity operatives – as in the people who actually own and operate the corporation behind-the-scenes), then the contract is lawfully considered “Null and Void” and unenforceable, even in a court of competent jurisdiction. Consequently, shady and corrupted corporations, and their corporate persons, to this day, assume a one-sided contractual agreement that they fraudulently impinge-upon and bind their Customers to, arbitrarily by deception. Per the only true contract at North America, which is the Constitution for the united states of America / united States of America Republic, the rights are invested into (reserved-to) the people (* See Bill of Rights – Amendment X), respectfully the aboriginal and indigenous people of said African-descent, who have always been the Al Moroccans/Americans/Moors/Moorish Americans, along with their naturalized citizen subjects, within Moorish dominion at North America, for the public record, who abide by the supreme law of the land clause (* See Article VI within the United States Republic Constitution; Republic meaning “For the people…”).
The concept of a cashless society, per the new update, is not merely a technological advancement, but also a strategy that can empower those who already control vast resources, further entrenching the economic disparities that exist today. Caucasian/European colonial influences at North America have historically sought to manipulate systems for their extreme profiteering endeavors, and a deceptive transition to a cashless society represents a modern continuation of that pattern that has enslaved the Al Moroccans/Moors/Moorish Americans upon their own lands by blatant racketeering, estate escheatment, and historical misprision of treason (by having fraudulently and deceptively called Al Moroccans/Moors/Moorish Americans so-called “Black people” for over 160 years, to date); a travesty known around the world, but kept silent at North America in territories like Florida for the public record. By disguising corporate control as convenience, a fraudulent shift to a cashless society would risk enmeshing society in a web of unwanted dependency and passive obedience to corrupted corporate powers all over North America.
In conclusion, while the allure of a cashless society may seem attractive to greedy corporate persons or a miseducated general public, it is crucial to consider the horrible ramifications of such a shift. The extreme risks of regular corporate manipulation, instability, loss of privacy, and reduced natural people and consumer recourse, paint a grim picture of what could become a dystopian financial landscape, full of total fraud and corruption. As people and consumers, it is the responsibility of the general public to remain vigilant against hostile corporate adversity in any industry, to quickly question all of the motives behind such an unwanted shift, and to advocate for a fair, non-binding, and transparent transacting system that values the natural peoples’ right to autonomy (those who are the rightful heirs to the estate – the aboriginal and indigenous Al Moroccans/Americans/Moors/Moorish Americans) and security over corporate gains. A careful examination of the consequences and motivations behind the push for a cashless society reveals a reality that is far from desirable, as the new update clearly explains.
All Rights Reserved – Right to Free Press and Free Association
Pingback: Whatnot App Now Demanding Private Photo ID Moroccan Press at North America Now