Birthright Citizenship Deals With Jus Soli While Jus Sanguinis is Ancestral Bloodline Upon Aboriginal and Indigenous Estates
North America is the Rightful Al Moroccan Estate for Moors of Said African-descent by Jus Sanguinis
By: Real News at Florida Network and the Birthright Citizenship Dispelling at North America in Territories Like Florida
Date: 11 March 2025 A.D.
Understanding the Historical Context of the Supreme Law of the Land and the Jus Soli Birthright Citizenship Deception in 2025 A.D.
The complex legal landscape surrounding the United States corporation is deeply rooted in the true history for North America, and an examination of the foundational elements reveals significant tensions surrounding birthright citizenship, treaty obligations, and recognition of Aboriginal and Indigenous Al Moroccans at North America. Central to this discussion is the idea of national sovereignty, particularly as it relates to the rightful heirs to the North Gate Estate / North America by direct bloodline descendancy from their ancestors, who have lawfully passed-down inheritances for thousands of years, to date. North America, since the early 1800s, has been the battleground for Caucasian / European colonizers and their mixed-bloodline offspring / children in their total estate escheatment against the rightful heirs to the estate, who have always been the Aboriginal and Indigenous Al Moroccans / Americans / Moors / Moorish Americans / American natives / American nationals of said African-descent for the public record.
The United States Republic Constitution is the supreme law of the land. It has undergone numerous amendments (mostly fraudulently after the original 13 Amendments) and reinterpretations by colonial Magistrates feigning as lawful Judges, since its ratification. However, its foundational principles are grounded in a specific historical context that involves the colonization of North America by Europeans, specifically Caucasians, and the legal agreements like the Treaty of Peace and Friendship between Morocco and the United States in 1787; 1836 A.D. The Mother treaty for North America provided a once unique recognition of the United States as the thirteen (13) original colonies for Caucasians / European to govern their affairs for their own occupants (never government over the rightful heirs to the estate), emphasizing the importance of establishing friendly and peaceful commerce. It also implicitly acknowledged the existing Aboriginal and Indigenous Al Moroccans / Moors / Moorish Americans, who have always been the rightful heirs to the estate at North America.
The colonizers’ eventual hostile actions over the decades at North America and the subsequent and fraudulent Color-of-Law, Color-of-Authority, and Color-of-Office frameworks, deceitfully imposed upon the land since the mid 1800s, have raised ongoing debates regarding the once afforded privileges of naturalized citizens, compared to the birth-rights belonging to the Aboriginal and Indigenous Al Moroccans / Moors / Moorish Americans, often referred to in contemporary discussions as American natives and American nationals. A critical and lawful discrepancy clearly revolves around the principles of Jus Soli and Jus Sanguinis.
Jus Soli, or the right of soil, grants naturalized citizenship based on birthplace, while Jus Sanguinis, or the right of blood, stipulates that nationality is inherited through bloodline thus given absolute precedence over any Jus Soli claims made by naturalized citizens over estate heirs. Given the historical narrative, current and deceptive legalese practices conducted by Caucasian / European colonizers, their foreign allies, and incompetent people of said African-descent, aimed at trying to fortify and unlawfully effectuate Jus Soli claims, blatantly infringes upon the birth-rights of those with rightful historical claims through Jus Sanguinis—specifically, the Aboriginal and Indigenous Al Moroccans / Moors / Moorish Americans, who have lawfully inhabited and inherited the land at North America for thousands of year prior to any colonizer even setting foot on North American soil for the public record.
Critics argue that modern colonial body politics at North America, often referred to as the “government,” (even though they are not) reflects an ongoing extreme colonial framework that strives to alter the original agreements and the binding contracts which recognized the national sovereignty of the Aboriginal and Indigenous peoples to the land / estate. The constant struggle for Aboriginal birth-rights, as opposed to birthright citizenship, has often manifested in fraudulent legalese challenges from Caucasian / European profiteering investors, focused on absolute greed, where the truthful historical context has been intentionally overshadowed by contemporary misinterpretations of citizenship and who the naturalized citizens truly are at North America (i.e. the Caucasian / European U.S. Citizen, their mixed bloodline offspring, and their foreign allies who migrated to North America for estate escheatment endeavors).
In recent years, various advocacy groups have attempted to illuminate and remedy the historical injustices the rightful heirs to the North Gate Estate / North America, by asserting that any privileges or rights of naturalized citizens, do not supersede those of the Aboriginal and Indigenous Al Moroccans / Moors / Moorish Americans, who possess inherent national sovereignty (never to be confused with the co-intel FBI and CIA Sovereign Citizen false labels placed against rightful heirs to the estate, by colonial fraud, conspiracy, public slander, and overall racketeering) over their ancestral lands. Legal challenges rooted in such principles have sought to address the inequalities stemming from colonial parliament policies feigning as law, and Color-of-Law and Color-of-Authority legalese frameworks, highlighting the historical ramifications surrounding the lives of the Al Moroccan natives at North America.
The modern-day political conversations surrounding birthright citizenship and Aboriginal birth-rights, is not merely academic; the truthful narrative has real-world implications for de jure law legislation and absolute social justice movements across North America. With an increased awareness of Aboriginal and Indigenous birth-rights and the growing discourse on long-overdue financial reparations due to the rightful heirs to the North Gate Estate / North America, there has been a constant political push for the true recognition of historical grievances and the rightful heirs to the land / estate. The birthright citizen debate in modern-days is simply a colonial ploy for Caucasians / Europeans and their mixed bloodline offspring to fraudulently try to make land / estate claims over the rightful heirs to the estate at North America.
For many, understanding the historical and legal context is vital in navigating today’s civic landscape. It calls for a full reexamination of national identity and who qualifies as a rightful, naturalized citizen. Moving forward, it is imperative that open and public dialogue continues in an lawful manner concerning the rightful heirs to the estate and their lawful entitlements to their land and resources, which immediately considers historical truth and promotes full and lawful reconciliation between Aboriginal and Indigenous Al Moroccans / Moors / Moorish Americans and the naturalized (or illegally residing at North American) citizen population.
In conclusion, the conversation around citizenship in America must evolve, taking into account the historical rights of indigenous populations as well as the original treaties that laid the groundwork for the United States. Acknowledging these complexities is essential for fostering a society that values justice, equity, and respect for all its members, particularly those who have been historically marginalized. As the United States continues to define its identity, recognition of its past will be a critical determinant of its future.
All Rights Reserved – Right to Free Press and Free Association
